<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better docs, not better code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/</link>
	<description>www.thinkhole.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Oh, I definitely agree with you. :)

I didn&#039;t mean that code doesn&#039;t matter. Nor that a framework could lack key features and make up for it with pretty docs.  

I just think with the proliferation of Python web frameworks with similar feature sets (in the broadest sense), being &quot;easy to use&quot; is going to be a key selling point.

Either way, please keep posting! I&#039;m sure a lot of people would like to follow along with your experiences. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I definitely agree with you. :)</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mean that code doesn&#8217;t matter. Nor that a framework could lack key features and make up for it with pretty docs.  </p>
<p>I just think with the proliferation of Python web frameworks with similar feature sets (in the broadest sense), being &#8220;easy to use&#8221; is going to be a key selling point.</p>
<p>Either way, please keep posting! I&#8217;m sure a lot of people would like to follow along with your experiences. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Yang</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2005/12/14/better-docs-not-better-code/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>If you read my post you&#039;ll find out that one significant deciding factor is ease of deployment, i.e. I don&#039;t need to play around with Python Egg to get Django running on a shared box. I don&#039;t want to settle on one frame work, develop the app, and then later on find out it cannot be deployed on my cheap-ass web host (I know I should spend more :)

Something with good documentation and is quick to get started will definitely be valued at the first look -- but quality code and good features are also important. I might have very different opinions after digging through enough code :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read my post you&#8217;ll find out that one significant deciding factor is ease of deployment, i.e. I don&#8217;t need to play around with Python Egg to get Django running on a shared box. I don&#8217;t want to settle on one frame work, develop the app, and then later on find out it cannot be deployed on my cheap-ass web host (I know I should spend more :)</p>
<p>Something with good documentation and is quick to get started will definitely be valued at the first look &#8212; but quality code and good features are also important. I might have very different opinions after digging through enough code :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
