<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orthogonality considered pretentious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/</link>
	<description>There should be one obvious way to do it.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 04:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Heh. Well said.

Although it is awfully tempting to just think less and bang out some ugly (but working!) code sometimes.

PHP is a hard habit to kick. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Well said.</p>
<p>Although it is awfully tempting to just think less and bang out some ugly (but working!) code sometimes.</p>
<p>PHP is a hard habit to kick. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 04:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/02/22/orthogonality-considered-pretentious/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Hmm...

I would summarize the issue this way: with highly othogonal languages, a programmer writes less code, but has to think a bit harder; with non-orthognal languages, a progammer thinks less and writes more code.

I'd rather think than type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>I would summarize the issue this way: with highly othogonal languages, a programmer writes less code, but has to think a bit harder; with non-orthognal languages, a progammer thinks less and writes more code.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather think than type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
