Comments on: Obfuscated Python http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/12/08/obfuscated-python/ There should be one obvious way to do it. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:09:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: John http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/12/08/obfuscated-python/#comment-17657 John Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:31:03 +0000 http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/12/08/obfuscated-python/#comment-17657 Indeed! Although... one could almost claim that the code itself is not hard to read, it's just that some of the instructions are packed/encoded in the string. So is it really obfuscated? Indeed!

Although… one could almost claim that the code itself is not hard to read, it’s just that some of the instructions are packed/encoded in the string. So is it really obfuscated?

]]> By: tclark http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/12/08/obfuscated-python/#comment-17642 tclark Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:32:17 +0000 http://thinkhole.org/wp/2006/12/08/obfuscated-python/#comment-17642 Ok, this is just nutty. Obfuscated Perl or C is perfectly natural, but this is too much. Ok, this is just nutty. Obfuscated Perl or C is perfectly natural, but this is too much.

]]>