<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spoiled by WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/</link>
	<description>There should be one obvious way to do it.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/#comment-35448</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/#comment-35448</guid>
		<description>Sendmail... &lt;em&gt;:shiver:&lt;/em&gt;

Anyway...

It's a valid point that writing a replacement app is what gives us innovation in many areas. But to think that I'm going to single-handedly write a Django-based weblog that will be comparable to WordPress in features/scope is a little far-fetched if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sendmail&#8230; <em>:shiver:</em></p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a valid point that writing a replacement app is what gives us innovation in many areas. But to think that I&#8217;m going to single-handedly write a Django-based weblog that will be comparable to WordPress in features/scope is a little far-fetched if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Powell</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/#comment-35443</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/18/spoiled-by-wordpress/#comment-35443</guid>
		<description>I call this the "bringing sand to the beach" phenomenon.  Why do what 100 other devs before you have done?  On one hand it's a valid argument.  On the other we'd all still be using sendmail if there were no reason to ever write a new $something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call this the &#8220;bringing sand to the beach&#8221; phenomenon.  Why do what 100 other devs before you have done?  On one hand it&#8217;s a valid argument.  On the other we&#8217;d all still be using sendmail if there were no reason to ever write a new $something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
