<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The two camps of Python framework design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/19/the-two-camps-of-python-framework-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/19/the-two-camps-of-python-framework-design/</link>
	<description>There should be one obvious way to do it.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: import this. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full-stack vs. glue vs. coupling</title>
		<link>http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/19/the-two-camps-of-python-framework-design/#comment-36018</link>
		<dc:creator>import this. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full-stack vs. glue vs. coupling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkhole.org/wp/2007/02/19/the-two-camps-of-python-framework-design/#comment-36018</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I mentioned James Bennett’s discussion of the two camps of Python framework design. Ian Bicking has responded to James and seems to disagree. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I mentioned James Bennett’s discussion of the two camps of Python framework design. Ian Bicking has responded to James and seems to disagree. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
